Barnes&Noble Form 10-K Annual Report ____ Filed Jun 26, 2015

Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Sincerely,

George et al

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

fs2006

Rank: President [?]

Points: 6748 [?]

Votes: 86 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Barnes&Noble Form 10-K Annual Report ____ Filed Jun 26, 2015

posted on Jul 24, 2015 04:43PM

Technology Properties Limited et al. v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., et al.

On July 24, 2012, Technology Properties Limited, LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions, LLC, and Patriot Scientific Corporation (collectively, TPL) filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that the Company is infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,809,336, U.S. Patent No. 5,440,749, and U.S. Patent No. 5,530,890 through the importation, manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sale in the United States of NOOK TM products. The District Court stayed the action between September 26, 2012 and May 19, 2014 during the pendency of a related U.S. International Trade Commission investigation. On June 9, 2014, the Company

answered the complaint, denying TPL’s material allegations, asserting several affirmative defenses, and asserting counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity. On July 22, 2014, TPL served its preliminary infringement contentions. On September 12, 2014, the Company served its preliminary invalidity contentions.

On October 15, 2014, the District Judge overseeing the case found the case to be related to seven other pending cases in which TPL alleges that other defendants infringe the three asserted TPL patents. The District Judge then referred all eight cases to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial management purposes, including the preparation of a report and recommendation on claim construction and summary judgment. On November 20, 2014, the Magistrate Judge set various pretrial dates in the eight cases, including a July 22, 2015 fact discovery cutoff, a September 16, 2015 expert discovery cutoff, and a November 12, 2015 claim construction and summary judgment hearing. The Magistrate Judge did not set a trial date.

On February 4, 2015, the Company filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings directed to TPL’s U.S. Patent No. 5,809,336 (’336 patent) on the grounds that the ’336 patent is barred by the Kessler doctrine because the ITC previously found that the Company did not infringe the ’336 patent in the related ITC investigation and TPL chose not to appeal the ITC’s decision to the Federal Circuit. On May 31, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation denying the Company’s motion. The Company had until June 15, 2015 to file objections to the report and recommendation before the District Judge.

On April 10, 2015, the Company also filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings directed to TPL’s U.S. Patent No. 5,440,749 (‘749 patent) on the grounds that the asserted claims of the ’749 patent are invalid as indefinite for reciting both an apparatus and a method of using that apparatus. TPL opposed the Company’s motion. Oral argument on the motion was held on May 19, 2015. The Magistrate Judge took the motion under submission.