Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Bentonstocks

Rank: President [?]

Points: 6383 [?]

Votes: 291 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles

posted on Apr 02, 2008 08:41AM

ATs (e.g. AT1, AT2) are not Eagles (e.g. DE1, DE2) until they are confirmed by drilling to be mineralized deposits.

The geophysics suirveys generate targets, which they name by AT#, and then they drill them. If they proved to be mineralized deposits they will be named DE# in order of discovery... DE1 of course being the first.