Does anyone else find it odd that Noront chose to highlight the lowest concentration of chromite (even though it was the widest band)? Much was made in previous NRs about the high concentration of chromite, and it seems likely that reporting one of the higher-concentration bands (or the highest: 17 metres averaging 43.84 per cent Cr2O3(!!!)) (or the highest product of width times concentration, even) would have been a more consistent and better approach.

Just seems like the choice of the headline would indicate a significant *decrease* in the concentration/quality of the deposit to anyone not reading the entire NR.