Hi goldember;

I was refering to hole BG2011-1,where it appeared that they may have just missed the proposed target. Its possible I am interpreting this wrong, but I have to ask why they wouldn,t try to hit this bigger target first. Here is the part of the NR that I based my assumption on.

It also intersected 1.3 g/t gold over 4.6 meters within the sulphides. It intersected an interpreted mineralized structure identified by IP Dipole-Dipole geophysics and is considered secondary to a much larger structure nearby. More drilling is required. BG2011-1 was drilled vertically to a total depth of 266.7 meters and terminated in anomalous mineralization.

Sorry, if I may have caused any confusion.