Just wondering & Bear has probably hit on this several times. Tried wading back threw many many posts & asked a couple of these questions back a bit but didn't receive any clarification.

 

Would it be fair to say since we achieved around 220 events or there abouts 3 months ago that all those events have now been fully adjudicated? Say even 200 of them?

 

If yes - who gets to see that blinded information first & how quickly? (trials annouced as over & we have hit our 250+)

 

Would it then be safe to say several/many/inside people would now have a pretty good idea how this trial went looking at 4/5th's of the trials population fully adjudicated profile or at least a very significant portion of it?

 

If any of the above rings true we could see action one way or another a lot quicker that what we might have thought? 

 

Maybe they keep all the info blinded until the very last patient is fully adjudicated?

 

TIA & sorry if this is broken record stuff.

 

glta