...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
Message: What would a successful BETonMACE Top-Line Data Announcement Look Like?

 

quest13 - In the NR linked here  https://www.resverlogix.com/investors/news?article=497  in early 2014 as analysed by a third party there is no mention at all about any significant differences between Crestor and Lipitor in the MACE results. There was a difference in plaque regression but that didn't seem to be significant enough to have a separate statement made about it. The single biggest issue that I remember hearing about for ASSURE was non-compliance for patients taking their drugs. If I remember the story correctly there was one patient who was supposed to have been in the dosed category that had not taken apabetalone at all and had 5.8% plaque growth, which was enough all on its own to make us miss the mark. I have not been able to find any official comments on this story so I caution the readers to take it with a grain of salt.

 

The MACE numbers in the SUSTAIN and ASSURE trials were very compelling for the combination of both Crestor and Lipitor patients. Both of those trials measured 5 point MACE where as BETonMACE is measuring 3 point MACE. If we come anywhere close to the numbers achieved in the combined SUSTAIN/ASSURE 5 point MACE numbers we will all be dancing in the streets.

I can't seem to get the link to work. The News Release is the first one in January of 2014 listed on the RVX website.

 

tada

 

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply