"Also, the other six TX 7 defendants were only sued for 3 of our 4 patents, and they all got licenses for the entire PP."

That is not the way I see it.....this is what I have noted..

1) LG ELECTRONICS USA-- DONE (doc92 10/14/08{7 months}) PR9/25/2008(no name mention) FlashR/Xlicense certain patents,10Q 2008-11-14

2) CASIO AMERICA--DONE (doc104 11/21/08{8 months})..PR12/2/2008 (all foreign and domestic patents including FlashR/Xlicense) 10Q2009-02-10

3) NIKON-- DONE (doc118 12/17/08 {9 months})...PR1/8/2009(no name mention) FlashR, 10Q2008-12-31/filed 2009-02-10

4) OLYMPUS AMERICA--DONE (doc 127 2/3/09 {10 months})...PR4/1/2009 (all foreign and domestic patents including FlashR), 10Q 2009-06-13 year end

5) SANYO NORTH AMERICA--DONE (doc 128 2/5/09 {10 months})...PR3/5/ 2009(no name mention)FlashR/10Q 2009-06-13year end to be a Panasonic entity

6) AVID ELECTRONICS--DONE (doc 130 2/6/09 {10 months})...PR3/17/2009(no name mention) FlashR/Xlicense certain patents, 10Q 2009-06-13 year end

7) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA-DONE (doc 177 10/21/09 {19 months})...PR10/22/2009(all foreign and domestic patents including FlashR/Xlicense certain patents,),10Q 2009-11-16

As it looks to me...Casio, Olympus, Samsung.....got All rights....the others got FlashR only.

They sure are keeping it obscure as to what is what......but that's OK with me.

The main consideration was removable memory types and pulling a card during a file execution.....FlashR IMO.

The reason RP would not answer a question of what the R stood for....I say it's READ.

doni