Well you can all read the response....

One issue I see interesting is this

RE: construction if need be....

B. “social template”

The term “social template” should be construed as “data structure associated

with a social hierarchy and one or more social signatures.” This is the broadest

reasonable interpretation of the term, is the construction agreed to by the parties in

the related District Court case (see Ex. 2003), and is the construction adopted by

this Board in two related reviews (see Case Nos. IPR2015-01471 at p. 7 and

IPR2015-01475 at p. 8).

Wow, if that be the case, things have been happening without being noticed on the docket.

Anyway, things are moving, and Purcells response looks good to me. Shot the hell out of Williams

doni