Correction to my previous message.

Where JB says, "They are both part and contiguous to each other of the very large Hay Mountain porphyry system which appears at this time to be 8 miles long and 6 miles wide, making it larger than our plots of Bingham Canyon, Utah as plotted in a MS Thesis I supported by a fellow from Europe, or Morenci, Arizona, from my personal files," I earlier suggested there were two targets. 

Re-reading JB, I understand my confusion.  Both LBSR and TMBXF targets in the Hay Mountain/Zebra project areas are one-in-the-same.  This means LBSR does not now have to share that target, nor the related Carlin-style mineralization, which seems to have been unknown to TMBXF. 

...all with a footprint larger than Bingham Canyon, and perhaps deeper!  Bingham Canyon has been in production since 1873, is still producing, and has produced more copper than any other mine ever. 

VP