Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Have a great Sunday, especially those of you like me that are celebrating Orthodox Easter ... As well as those of you who are also like me and mourning another Maple Leafs Game 7 exit ... Ugggh!

Sincerely,

George et al

Message: Zijin buying stakes in Papua New Guinea/Congo Mines

I am getting around ~17.1 billion for MI&I, although the prices for the metals used at that time could have been different and I just took some spot prices.

But I am correct to say if Teck was going to pay 1.00/lb Cu (just some random number i made up) it would be based off the Measured and Indicated or Proven and Probable not the Measured Indicated and Inferred? Or else the price would be lower for the Inferred resource (Say like $0.50/lb Cu) or the entire lot would be reduced to $0.90/lb Cu (again made up number to show decrease in price because of including inferred) because of the inferred?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply