HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Sincerely,

George et al

Message: LNG venture offers $1-billion for aboriginal consent
Many of the BC situations we read about are about FN bands that did not sign treaties so they have rights that the Matawa FN's don't have an entitlement to. What we see is NAN encouraging Matawa FN to negotiate for the same rights on 'traditional lands'. I doubt that any level of gov't is going to be proactive and lock themself into giving FN anymore extended 'rights'. That said the mining companies and gov't are under significantly more pressure to get this done. The mining compaies because share holders are going to eventually give up on the projects and companies working in the ROF. The gov't because is going to lose on the flow of royalties and taxes that come from exploration and mining I'm with the many that have stated they won't invest in any future Ont project where FN issues are in play. Just not worth it.

Waiting to hear something to indicate which direction this is going.

... Been There
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply