Why would anyone NOT invested be interested in the company moving forward (Ms. McClenehan and fellow directors)? Yet very interested in fighting to keep control of the company in which they have no vested interest, and can easily spend treasury money on many things besides moving the company forward in the best interests of its shareholders. You say let her raise money and get back to work? There was plenty of money in the treasury to "get back to work" with long before her battle to maintain control of SLI began.