AVEC 100-K Estimated shipping date to production facility is January 15, 2009.
posted on
Jan 14, 2009 05:33AM
Edit this title from the Fast Facts Section
http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...
·
|
AVEC has chosen Everson Tesla, Inc. (www.eversontesla.com) as U.S. manufacturer for all AVEC electric motors.
|
·
|
AVEC has formed a Joint Venture with Constellation Capital Management, LLC of Novato, California in order to pursue the direct investment in the US wind power industry.
|
·
|
The AVEC Board of Directors has authorized the purchase by the Joint Venture of up to 25 megawatts of existing US wind power facilities as the first step in implementing the Joint Venture’s business plan.
|
·
|
AVEC is in discussions concerning development of an all-electric taxi. AVEC anticipates announcement of a joint venture development program in the near future.
|
·
|
AVEC intends to aggressively pursue Federal clean energy development grants.
|
·
|
Beginning on January 1, 2009, AVEC will begin the process of making required filings with US regulatory agencies in anticipation of allowing the Company’s common stock to trade on a larger exchange.
|
·
|
CEO Chhaunker will be making a presentation next week to the World Wind Energy Association (www.wwindea.org).
|
·
|
In January, AVEC will file notice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including publishing a Proxy Statement that will include important matters for shareholder consideration and approval.
|
·
|
CEO Chhaunker invited additional questions from shareholders, via e-mail to [email protected].
|
·
|
US wind market- 21,017 Mw installed, 8,584 Mw announced/under development/under construction
|
·
|
California wind market- 1,560 Mw installed, and in excess of 1500 Mw announced/under development/under construction
|
·
|
Current environment- despite positive alternative energy “press,” declining energy prices and poor debt market translate into negative environment for new projects.
|
·
|
Using current market data, the value of the overall market is as follows (using $0.075 kWh capacity and energy)
|
US Existing
|
US Development
|
California
Existing
|
California
Development
|
|
100%
|
$ 13.8 Billion
|
$ 5.6 Billion
|
$ 1.02 Billion
|
$ 985 Million
|
25%
|
$ 3.4 Billion
|
$ 1.4 Billion
|
$ 256 Million
|
$ 246 Million
|
·
|
California continues to lead the US market in size, complexity, regulatory mechanisms, and innovation
|
·
|
Despite significant positive press, California utilities (PG&E, So Cal Edison) have a long history of difficult relations with alternative energy projects.
|
·
|
Current California wind projects have characteristics which include a) in the range of $.02 in capacity payments, b) $0.05-.07 in energy payments, c) up to 25% delivery penalties, d) in many projects, significant (in the range of double) incentive energy payments for daytime, summertime generation.
|
·
|
When avoided costs decrease, inefficiency of existing copper wire generators is exacerbated.
|
·
|
Even though California utilities are far more supportive of alternative energy today, wind projects that are placed in probation (for non-delivery) are at risk for utility recapture of past capacity payments.
|
·
|
California LLC or other suitable corporate form
|
·
|
Exclusive right to US retrofit market for AXVC generators in alternative energy market
|
·
|
Several key JV personnel identified, including candidate CEO/COO.
|
·
|
80% owned by AXVC and 20% owned by Constellation Capital Management, LLC of Novato California
|
·
|
Among the JV team members in various capacities are myself from Constellation/Redwood, Faramarz Yazdani from FMY Associates and Bill Eigner, a partner at Procopio Cory, major law firm in San Diego, California. With the very capable assistance of Bill and Faramarz, I have significant and successful experience in California alternative energy projects. Bill, Faramarz and I are enthusiastic about joining the JV team and working with AXVC on US and California wind projects.
|
·
|
JV goal/objective is to retrofit AXVC 100Kw generators in up to 200 Mw of existing US wind projects within the first 12-18 months.
|
·
|
During the first 12-18 months, JV will work closely with AXVC in order to begin development of full range of AXVC generators. As Sanjay described, AXVC generators are highly scalable. JV anticipates development of 50kW, 150Kw, 500Kw and 1 Mw generators in the next 12-18 months.
|
·
|
During the first 12-18 months, JV and AXVC intend to work closely with a major manufacturer of utility scale battery packages. JV anticipates installation of battery component at each of the JV’s projects.
|
·
|
AXVC BOD has just approved a significant enhancement to JV’s business plan.
|
·
|
JV intends to purchase 100% interest in up to 25 Mw of existing California wind energy projects.
|
·
|
25 Mw of existing wind energy projects probably cost owners in the range of $1 million per Mw, or $25 million. JV believes that target projects can be purchased in today’s markets at extremely attractive prices.
|
·
|
Target purchases will have the following characteristics: a) still capable of mechanical operation, b) within 18 months of cessation of operation, such that generation contract with utility still in place, c) no major contract issues with host utility, d) substantial remaining contract term, e) attractive contract economics, f) reliable wind data for site, g) attractive purchase price.
|
·
|
JV intends to immediately begin to solicit project purchases.
|
·
|
In the case of a California 10 Mw “standard reference” project, the project’s historical performance is in the range of 20-25% capacity factor.
|
·
|
The standard reference project is assumed to operate under “California mean wind conditions,” as published by the California Energy Commission. The mean wind conditions are assumed, based upon this published data, to be 15 MPH.
|
·
|
For purposes of analyzing financial sensitivity only, and not with a view to making financial forecasts, the JV assumes that the standard reference 10Mw retrofit project, using the AXVC 100Kw generator, will achieve a generating efficiency of 100% at a wind speed of 15 MPH. Since this is a mean wind speed, the sensitivity model assumes 100% generation half of the time, and zero generation half of the time.
|
·
|
Available dynamometer data for the AXVC 100Kw generator suggests that efficient generation below 15 MPH is likely. However, there sensitivity assumes no generation below 15 MPH.
|
·
|
Although the JV business plan calls for concurrent installation of a battery system, no provision for battery enhancement of project capacity factors is used in this analysis.
|
·
|
If the JV structures an investment in which the project retains 75% of project cash flow up to the point where historical capacity is achieved (with the JV keeping 25%), and the sharing is reversed (25% current owners and 75% JV) above historical capacity, both parties do well. The existing owners will make either the same amount of money or 5%-10% more money, and THE JV will achieve in the range of $3 million in energy and capacity payments.
|
·
|
In the case of the same 10 Mw standard reference project where the JV purchases 100% of the existing project, the JV’s cash flow would be in the range of $4.8 million.
|
·
|
AXVC and the JV have preliminarily agreed that the purchase price of the existing facility would be accounted for, at the JV level, as senior secured debt due from the JV to AXVC.
|
·
|
Based upon the figures that we have described, AXVC’s 100% purchase investment would have a cash on cash payback period of approximately one year.
|