Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Exploration Potential
27
Jul 28, 2013 12:41AM
14
Jul 28, 2013 02:11PM
7
Jul 28, 2013 04:05PM
3
Jul 28, 2013 04:10PM
2
Jul 28, 2013 07:45PM

OK there is definately some confusion being generated by these 2 posts. To clarify, the waste rock that was talked about in thge FS as revenue generating potentially ,but was being treated as waste due to inferred categorization, is within the known block model scattered throughout as inferred (blue).

What RT is getting to is that the North East pit wall, which has large amounts of material that have to be cleared (waste rock) to keep the slope manageable and safe, is overlying the north east chargeability which has not yet been drilled and likely is mineralized. This is indeedthe case however more likely to be mineralized at depth. If Teck is to maximize their ability to get to the high grade material at depth, beyond the pit shell of the FS, and possibly the North East mineralized material within the coinciding chargeability, then they will indeed have to rework that massive end of the pit and take out more if not the entire face of the mountain (you have to move out to move down in this scenario.

9
Jul 28, 2013 09:02PM
3
Jul 28, 2013 09:35PM
2
Jul 28, 2013 10:23PM
2
Jul 29, 2013 11:52AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply