Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Sincerely,

George et al

Message: news
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

It looks like you're using M&I numbers while I used M&I&I to show how  some of the metal can move between categories depending  on who and how the numbers are estimated. Either approach is fine as long as you specify which one and compare apples to apples. They didn't use a NSR cut-off for resources in the FS, but a cueq % cut-off. The $ 6.60 NSR was used for ther reserves. Teck uses the NSR approach for resources and so will the new PEA. I don't see how you can book another 5% as a certainty when the statistical variation between results from multiple users of the same input data will be on the order of 5%. Remember when Elmer put out the numbers from the Teck RE and said they weren't significantly different from the FS numbers?

4 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply