Welcome to the Crystallex HUB on AGORACOM

Crystallex International Corporation is a Canadian-based gold company with a successful record of developing and operating gold mines in Venezuela and elsewhere in South America

Free
Message: 2009 article /// Noteholders

Crystallex's Venezuela woes grow

Faces investor suit

Julius Melnitzer, Financial Post Published: Wednesday, June 17, 2009

When Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez says "no," does it really mean "no"?

It's not a question that would normally engage the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. However, in a world where politics, business and legalities can easily collide, what Mr. Chavez really means is at the heart of a US$102-million lawsuit by investors of Crystallex International Corp., a gold-mining company.

The key issue in the case focuses on the duties that directors of businesses in deteriorating financial circumstances have to a company's creditors.

According to the aggrieved investors, Mr. Chavez meant what he said when he announced in September, 2008, that he would turn over the Las Cristinas gold mining project, Crystallex's main asset, to a consortium composed of Venezuelan and Russian interests. The investors are tired of the company continuing to spend millions of dollars on a project they believe is doomed to failure.

"The company seems to have an endless appetite for being misled and abused by the Venezuelan government, an appetite that has worked and continues to work to the detriment of investors," said Stephen Hope, the managing member of the San Francisco-based Outrider Fund, which owns about $17-million of the $100-million in senior unsecured notes held by Computershare Trust Company of Canada for a variety of investors.

However, Markus Koehnen of Mc-Millan in Toronto, who represents Crystallex, says the suit has no merit.

"The bondholders are complaining that the company pursued the Venezuelan opportunity for too long, and that amounts to an attack on the business judgment of the directors," Mr. Koehnen says. "But it's fairly standard black-letter law that this kind of decision is one for the board to make, and just because the bondholders think the opportunity should not be pursued further doesn't make it so."

The Las Cristinas area, owned by the Venezuelan government, is estimated to contain 35.2 million ounces of gold. Crystallex has a licence to mine and develop the deposit, but it needs an environmental permit to begin production. The company had been pursuing the permit for almost six years when the Venezuelan Ministry of the Environment denied the application in April, 2008.

In hindsight, that ought not to have been a complete surprise. Both Mr. Chavez and other officials had repeatedly suggested the government would nationalize the gold-mining industry.

In September, 2008, Mr. Chavez announced he was "taking back the mines." The Minister of Mines followed with a press release stating that, "by 2009, the state will take back, operate and manage the Las Cristinas mine." Although the minister later rescinded a statement that he would offer the project to Rusoro, a Russiancontrolled miner, he did not retract the government's intention to "take back" Las Cristinas.

Crystallex, however, continued with internal appeals through the Venezuelan government, which have proven fruitless so far. The investors also say the company continues to honour spending commitments in Venezuela despite the government's failure to hold up its side of the bargain. "We brought the application because it's time to stop spending money on rainbows," says Rob Staley, who, with colleague Derek Bell at Bennett Jones in Toronto, represents the bondholders.

Indeed, the company has announced it may exhaust its cash reserves by the fourth quarter of 2009.

"The cash burn is surprisingly high for a company without active business operations," Mr. Hope said.

All this, the investors say, means Crystallex will default on its notes when they come due in 2011. "At the highest conceptual level, you have to ask yourself whether creditors have to stand by when a company that's driving towards a cliff that it knows is there decides to continue navigating in that direction," Mr. Bell said. "At a certain point, surely, 'no' means 'no.' "

The lawsuit aims to preserve the remaining cash by having the court declare continued expenditures "oppressive." Investors also hope to recover the balance owing on the notes by way of equipment sales and the proceeds of an international arbitration they believe the company should institute against the Venezuelan government.

The case may present an opportunity for the courts to clarify the Supreme Court of Canada's 2004 decision in Peoples Department Stores Inc. v. Wise. There, the high court ruled that directors and officers do not owe a fiduciary duty to creditors of a corporation, even when it is insolvent or on the verge of insolvency.

"But the Supreme Court left wide open the possibility of unpaid creditors asserting claims based on the oppression remedy and the duty of care that exists in the Canada Business Corporations Act," says Arthur Peltomaa of Bennett Jones.

The oppression remedy, the court observed, was the broadest redress of its kind in the common law world. Still, the duty of care did not demand "perfection" from directors and officers, who were entitled to the benefit of the "business judgment rule."

Still, the court did state that creditors' interests increase in relevancy as a corporation's finances deteriorate. Similarly, determining the best interests of the corporation from time to time may involve consideration of a broad range of stakeholders.

"While the Supreme Court has emphasized that directors' fiduciary duty is to the corporation and not to a single group of stakeholders, creditors can continue to insist that the directors act in a manner that recognizes the economic reality of those whose interests are most at risk when a corporation is in financial trouble," said lawyer Kevin McElcheran of McCarthy Tetrault in Toronto.

A hearing to establish the trial schedule is set for the end of July, and the case could begin in August.

http://www.financialpost.com/news-sectors/legal/story.html?id=1702955&p=1

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply