Welcome to the Crystallex HUB on AGORACOM

Crystallex International Corporation is a Canadian-based gold company with a successful record of developing and operating gold mines in Venezuela and elsewhere in South America

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Have a great Sunday, especially those of you like me that are celebrating Orthodox Easter ... As well as those of you who are also like me and mourning another Maple Leafs Game 7 exit ... Ugggh!

Sincerely,

George et al

Message: Citgo: between the imperialist voracity and the delivery of Maduro
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Rooski, I don't know the answer to your question of whether it is committee/opt-ins who are entitled, or is it all commons who are entitled as a result of the Committee Goslings legal action.

One might have thought that if it there was only one solitary common share-holder entitled to a settlement, then legally it would have to be the entire class of common shareholders who are entitled. But I hope that is not correct (appologies to any common shareholders who are not opt-ins or committee).

At the time the Committe was formed and Gosslings was retained there was a question that if one did not "opt-in" that one may not be entitled to a portion of the settlement. So, from a legal perspective, would it be OK for only the opt-in/Committee common shareholders to receive a distribution of a portion of the winnings, while the remaining common shareholders received none?

thelongrunner

Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply