>How in the world can you exclude the possibility that by a swap of shares a price can be locked ?

Who said anything about a swap of shares? This is the statement I was responding to:

"Just wondering whether this roadblock or if we interpret it in another way of locking the price is not a timid suggestion of what may happen in the near future.... i.e another issue of shares or in the way of options granted to management ?"

I was also trying to help with the misconception that 499,500 was an accurate number of shares bid at $0.205:

"That 499,500 bid for $0.205 has been there all morning. It hasn't changed in spite of the fact that there was over a 100,000 traded for $0.205"

So you know what - keep your board.

Merry Christmas