"and remand for further proceedings"... Is this back to square one and now we have to file for infringement claims with the new claim construction? Is this a life line?

My gut is that this is better than the appeals court siding with the claim constuction of the NDOC. Does this open us up for settlements? Pursuit of all the others by Dominion Harbour?

Concerning is this comment: "Although this minor modification to the district court’s construction likely does not affect the outcome in this case, because the parties stipulated to non-infringement under the district court’s construction,"...

But if they stipulated to non-infringement under the NDOC district court's construction, doesn't this opinion change the district court's construction so the stipulation would not apply?

I am surprisd there are no comments on this board...