There have been many companies that listed on the major exchanges that lasted long enough to use all of their shareholders money, and even borrow some. And then the same companies went belly up. Then, there are many companies that literally started in a garage. But nearly all of these many companies recieved an inflow of capital from various sources. Now, POET over the past decade seems to be bucking the outside financial support theme.   I read all of the complaints and support threads that seem to reflect 10 years of angst for some, and 10 years of euphoria over a "game changing" product/technology for others.

...if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck......  is it a duck?  Or a wolf in ducks clothing?

It is interesting how chronically angry some "investors" get about the way that POET is, or is not, doing this or that. Is it wise to remain invested/attached to a position if so many things are going "wrong"? Or should the unhappy stakeholders part ways with POET and seek alternative speculative positions?  Is POET a wolf in a duck's clothing?

Happy Holidays........ GO POET !!!