Increasingly, PEM is using words to portray what they think the OSZ will become, such as "gold camp", "new mining district," multiple mining operations," "multiple million ounce deposits," "re-emerging gold district," "The (new) water rights and industrial sites (allows) PEM to expand . . and advance to a district scale gold camp," Carln and Yukon like potential, etc. I have not known Del to exagerate. He is a cautious deep thinker. Your opinions please:
1. Is there a downside to using .25 g/p/t as the cut off grade, instead of the current .5 g/p/t? (Would add a bunch more ounces to 43-101).
2. Is there more to the company's goals and vision that we would like to hear more about?
3. Should Del resume a President's message to shareholders? If so, should it be quarterly, bi-annually, or just annually?

(the below is provided as an example of an article using "gold camp" in it.)


Resource Investing News (8/2/11) "At its wholly-owned Idaho Gold Project, Premium Exploration Inc. has two drill rigs testing its Deadwood zone exploration target and one drill is working on the Friday zone, conducting step-out drilling along strike to the south of the Friday-Petsite resource. Positive assay results from step-out drilling could potentially increase the current resource (343 Koz. Indicated at 0.9 g/t gold; 779 Koz. Inferred at 1.04 g/t gold). Since the start of the Phase-Four drill program, the company has extended the strike length of the Friday mineralization by 45%. Exploration drilling along the balance of the 172km property is designed to make new discoveries as the company's goal is to demonstrate a "GOLD CAMP" with the potential for many deposits."