...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Sincerely,

George et al

Message: Its out on SEDAR...
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Koo wrote "It will need a 2/3 majority to pass. And BM's cannot vote on this issue."

I'm not so sure about your statement that board members can't vote on this issue. From the information circular: "Due to their interest in the Royalty Preferred Share Amendment, Donald McCaffrey, Kelly McNeill, Eldon Smith and Kenneth Zuerblis abstained from voting on the resolution of the directors to approve the Royalty Preferred Share Amendment."

To me, it sounds like certain board members had to recuse themselved from voting as a board to move the amendment forward to the pending shareholder vote. They already "abstained" from the board vote. My interpretation is that board members can still vote in the shareholder vote.

2 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply