Cancun, I sure agree with you. In my opinion one of the weaknesses since I've been invested RVX has never been even close to effective in communications and they seem to have very little respect for retail investors. They don't use the stock market for fund raising generally.

I think bear, city, koo and others have explained how/why this happened but I would have thought that numerous scientists and others at RVX and advisors would have known the scientific requirements well in advance as the normal course of this type of business.

They should have had communications scenarios worked out well in advance e.g. if BoM passes, if it fails, near miss, etc. Oh well, water under the bridge again but it sure has undermined my confidence in RVX again.

I'm cynical again today but I'm holding my shares in hope. I held back in 2013 so why change now. At least there is some chance of a positive result in a group or an indication. Who knows, it could turn out to be incredible or at least 5 point MACE could be replicated or even more dramatic than the combined trial of the past.

GLTA

Toinv