Koo,

Do you believe RVX BoD's are acting in good faith?  They are responsible to protect the stockholder’s interest and if the Chairman or CEO are incompetent, the Board is responsible to find a replacement.

When DM talks about selling ZEN and using the proceeds for RVX BOM2, that is not possible without stockholder approval. Those funds belong to the stockholders of ZEN.  It takes a stockholder vote to approve the sell or merger of a company or its major asset. 

Where are the four or five major RVX stockholders?  Why is HL silent?  All is not right.

RVX has always been under funded, but there was a light ahead.  The science showed there was value. DM was diluting the stock in hopes of a greater future value.  We agreed and purchased stock.  Now at 5 or 6 cents a share there is no way to fund BoM2.  Without financing, company is out of business. 

We get the same stories from RVX communications.  Time diminishes the value of the patent. 

An investigation by CSA into RVX activities (especially with a major Chinese owner) would be a wakeup call, or just a letter from CSA. 

Boeing is going through a terrible time, forced the CEO out and separated the Chairman and CEO positions.  RVX Board should be taking action.

Not sure, but believe the CSA and SEC have the same responsibilities to protect shareholder’s interest.  Someone should review the Canadian securities law to see if RVX is in compliance.

A letter from CSA really would be a wakeup call.  sidebar