Fastfoot: The only potential downside to that quote from Garry is the following:

Do the time line.  If we start drilling after the ice thaw in early May for six weeks, and the resultant assays direct Bundtzen's economic report (as stated in Garry's quote) and it comes out 4 weeks later, we are at mid-July earliest (IMHO) just to take a decision to begin "underground exploration". 

We could see September as the beginning of potential exploratory mining ore for processing, sale and finally antimony an gold revenue.

IMHO, we need to get an economic forecast out NOW, not based on May-July drilling results, but based on what we already know NOW. This, assuming that what we know now is indicative of economic potential at WB. If not, we have to wait and we still do not know if WB is economical by simple definition of the argument I present.

Waiting for MORE assays from spring drilling will likely cause selling by impatient investors dropping the SP.

Obviously, good news on the fuel project would make this entire 'discussion' on the need to get the SP up, quite moot! We all can wait on the slow nature of gold exploration if our company is adding VALUE to it's shareholders investments through the other avenue.