Free
Message: How Could Fed Hike Without Draining ANY Liquidity??
2
Nov 06, 2015 08:48AM
1
Nov 09, 2015 02:23PM
1
Nov 17, 2015 01:43AM
2
Nov 17, 2015 01:47AM

Nov 17, 2015 06:51AM
1
Nov 17, 2015 09:03PM
1
Nov 19, 2015 02:12PM
2
Nov 21, 2015 01:52AM
1
Nov 21, 2015 06:52AM
2
Nov 21, 2015 11:29PM
1
Nov 22, 2015 01:21PM

Nov 22, 2015 03:39PM
2
Nov 23, 2015 01:57PM

Nov 24, 2015 07:28AM
2
Nov 24, 2015 10:41AM
2
Nov 24, 2015 11:22AM
1
Nov 24, 2015 12:36PM
1
Nov 24, 2015 12:54PM
4
Nov 24, 2015 02:16PM
2
Nov 29, 2015 09:14PM

Nov 29, 2015 09:29PM
2
Nov 30, 2015 10:36PM

Nov 30, 2015 11:18PM
2
Dec 06, 2015 01:27AM

Dec 09, 2015 07:17PM

Dec 09, 2015 09:01PM

Dec 10, 2015 12:43AM
2
Dec 15, 2015 02:31AM

Repo Experts Stumped: How Could Fed Hike Without Draining ANY Liquidity: "This Is A Market By Decree"

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 12/19/2015

"The Fed didn't really drain any liquidity yesterday. They moved the IOER up to .50%, moved the RRP rate up to .25%, and the RRP volume came in at $105 billion, only $3 billion more than the day before. Where was the draining? But interest rates moved up anyway to reflect the tightening, without any fundamental change. Basically, the Fed decreed a rate tightening and the market moved rates higher.... I wonder how many economic interest rate models include "by decree" as a factor?"

As we reported a little after 1:15pm on Thursday when the details of the Fed's first post-hike reverse repo operation were revealed, something very strange and unexpected happened: not only did the Fed not drain $1 trillion, or $800 billion, or even $310 billion, the Fed did not drain any incremental liquidity at all!

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply