Free
Message: ??translation claim construction for patent 108 Jan 2015/has 108 been set free?

Key points by Mr. Handle. C E not applicable in this case because now they are not identical. C E cannot be applied to 108, It is not the same as 774. We now have re exam documents with Ram on the diagram. Had the CO judge had that information the she could have made a different ruling.

Defendants argue 108 and 774 are the same. Judge ask where does it say that. This is a family of Patents so how is it the same. They also argued that you can run a circuit with a microprocessor with no Ram. That did not fly.

I say the Judges have done their homework. The case the defendantcited to support their argument, Judge says it is not related to this one. They are not similar.

My take. I am encouraged.

LOL

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply