Re: Pacer: New Case - e.Digital Corporation v. ArcSoft, Inc. - sman
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 12, 2015 08:21PM
Out of those three; the last one where it's tracking you via geo and making a decision to turn off/on something is us imo.... The first two are pretty standard industry applications.
Now on my Security DVR it has ability to turn on an additional camera/s in sequence if another is activated first, but that's controled by me, not a server relayed response eventhough nowdays it could be i guess.
I'm anticipating new 108 developments; which should trump this.
I'm just wondering how the new 108 rulings will affect ongoing suits; guess the micron pacer showed us, more claim dispute bs slung back-forth. grrrrrrrrrr
Have feeling without news we'll dwindle back below .1
e