Free
Message: Re: Pacer: New Case - e.Digital Corporation v. ArcSoft, Inc. - sman

Out of those three; the last one where it's tracking you via geo and making a decision to turn off/on something is us imo.... The first two are pretty standard industry applications.

Now on my Security DVR it has ability to turn on an additional camera/s in sequence if another is activated first, but that's controled by me, not a server relayed response eventhough nowdays it could be i guess.

I'm anticipating new 108 developments; which should trump this.

I'm just wondering how the new 108 rulings will affect ongoing suits; guess the micron pacer showed us, more claim dispute bs slung back-forth. grrrrrrrrrr

Have feeling without news we'll dwindle back below .1

e

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply