Pacer : e.DIGITAL v. Arcsoft - Joint claim construction hearing January,21, 2016
in response to
by
Message: Pacer : e.DIGITAL v. Arcsoft - Joint claim construction hearing January,21, 2016
Anton N. Handal (Bar No. 113812) [email protected] Gabriel G. Hedrick (Bar No. 220649) [email protected] Lauren G. Wilkinson (Bar No. 286212) [email protected] HANDAL & ASSOCIATES 750 B. Street, Suite 2510 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: 619.544.6400 Fax: 619.696.0323 Attorneys for Plaintiff E.DIGITAL CORPORATION Christopher S. Marchese [email protected] Olga May [email protected] FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Roger Borovoy [email protected] FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5021 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Defendant ARCSOFT, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA e.Digital Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ArcSoft, Inc., dba as Closeli and as simplicam. Defendant. Case No. 3:15-cv-00056-BEN-DHB JOINT HEARING STATEMENT [PATENT LOCAL RULE 4.2] Judge: Hon. Judge Roger T. Benitez Ctrm: Hearing: January 21, 2016 Time: 9:30 a.m. Pursuant to Patent Local Rule (“Patent L.R.”) 4.2 and the Court’s June 29, 2015 (“Scheduling Order”) (Doc. No. 32), Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“Plaintiff” or “e.Digital”) and Defendant Arcsoft, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Arcsoft”) (collectively, the “Parties”) submit this Joint Hearing Statement in advance of the claim construction hearing scheduled in this matter for January 21, 2016, Case 3:15-cv-00056-BEN-DHB Document 42 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 5 2- JOINT HEARING STATEMENT PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4.2 HANDAL & ASSOCIATES 750 B STREET SUITE 2510 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 TEL: 619.544.6400 FAX: 619.696.0323 concerning Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,306,514 (“the ’514 patent”); 8,311,522 (“the ’522 patent”); 8,311,523 (“the ’523 patent”); 8,311,524 (“the ’524 patent”); and 8,315,619 (“the ’619 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). I. MOST SIGNIFICANT DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION As required under Patent L.R. 4.2.a, the parties jointly identify the following claim terms of the asserted patents, whose constructions are believed to be most significant to the resolution of this case, and whose constructions are believed by one or more parties to be claim dispositive.1 Claim Term or Phrase Patent Believed Dispositive? social signature All Y social template All Y social hierarchy All Y unique social signature All Y first detected sensor value All Y second detected sensor value All Y sensor value range All Y information All Y provided…/provide/provides an update ’514, ’523, ’619 Y provide/provides/providing differing levels of information All Y 1 For the sake of clarity and as set forth in the Joint Claim Construction Chart (Appendix A) filed herewith, e.Digital asserts that none of the claim constructions proposed by the parties is dispositive. Case 3:15-cv-00056-BEN-DHB Document 42 Filed 10/26/15 Page 2 of 5 3- JOINT HEARING STATEMENT PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4.2 HANDAL & ASSOCIATES 750 B STREET SUITE 2510 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 TEL: 619.544.6400 FAX: 619.696.0323 Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.2.b, the Joint Claim Construction Chart, filed herewith as Appendix A, contains each party’s proposed constructions of the disputed claim terms and phrases, together with an identification of intrinsic and extrinsic evidence proffered by the parties in support of their constructions. Each party reserves the right to refer to the evidence proffered by the other. Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.2.c, the Joint Claim Construction Worksheet is filed herewith as Appendix B. II. ANTICIPATED LENGTH OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING The parties anticipate that the claim construction hearing will require approximately four (4) hours, if that is feasible based on the Court’s schedule. III. WITNESSES Neither party intends to rely on or call any witnesses at the claim construction hearing. IV. ORDER OF PRESENTATION AT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING The parties have agreed that they will present their arguments on a term-byterm basis at the hearing, with the party seeking construction presenting first for each such term. HANDAL & ASSOCIATES Dated: October 26, 2015 By: /s/Gabriel G. Hedrick Anton N. Handal Gabriel G. Hedrick Lauren G. Wilkinson Attorneys for Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation /s/Christopher S. Marchese Christopher S. Marchese [email protected] Olga May Case 3:15-cv-00056-BEN-DHB Document 42 Filed 10/26/15 Page 3 of 5 4- JOINT HEARING STATEMENT PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4.2HANDAL & ASSOCIATES 750 B STREET SUITE 2510 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 TEL: 619.544.6400 FAX: 619.696.0323 [email protected] FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Roger Borovoy [email protected] FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5021 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Defendant ArcSoft, Inc. ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, I, Gabriel G. Hedrick, attest that the above signatories have read and approved the foregoing and consent to its filing in this action. By /s/Gabriel G. Hedrick Gabriel G. Hedrick
22 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
7
Oct 28, 2015 11:54AM
6
Oct 28, 2015 12:04PM
1
Oct 28, 2015 02:19PM
19
Oct 28, 2015 02:30PM
7
Oct 28, 2015 02:40PM
Oct 28, 2015 03:02PM
18
Oct 28, 2015 03:04PM
5
Oct 28, 2015 03:17PM
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply