Re: AIA/dischino
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 15, 2017 10:53AM
If we look back at all events starting with the suit against edig for failure to deliver about 85K in batteries to digEcor, a 4 year legal mess that we prevailed in, at the 2 year point, the company got very quiet, under advice of our defense attorney, which was on EDIG'S nickel.
When DM hit the scene, Mar, 2008 with the TX7 suits, at the Sept 17, 2008 shm, we asked how the company would be keeping us posted on legal events. The answer by Putnam was this, "from Pacer".
He did not say "we will send out PR's to keep all informed of details of court proceedings on a regular basis".
The company culture changed drastically under advice/instructions of counsel to this day, to include the company SEC advisor tying Fred's hand even tighter which became evident when one on one visits were halted in 2011 if my memory is correct.
Bottom line, people are expecting communication out of the company on matters they are restricted to provide, by the lawyers....blame them guys and gals for Fred's silence.
Nothing will change for reasons explained by Fred and many of us here year after year.
We are all on a level playing field, we all know how it has been and how it will be, when the lawyers are calling the shots.
Now...the 10-K is due very soon, let's see what Fred has to say.