Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Why would TECK walk?
3
Jan 07, 2013 06:18PM
3
Jan 07, 2013 06:19PM
7
Jan 07, 2013 06:25PM
6
Jan 07, 2013 06:44PM
2
Jan 07, 2013 06:51PM
16
Jan 07, 2013 06:54PM
1
Jan 07, 2013 07:02PM
Exactly. Does WRN all of a sudden have a huge bump up to get to 100% of their NPV on Casino? Nope. Having a very mediocre BFS doesn't help the cause. If Teck walks, I would hazard to guess that CUU share price would exhibit the SP to NPV valuation gap that WRN is witnessing. Don't do the math, it isn't pretty.

I agree that the current optics of our SP and complete lack of PR from CUU is very concerning. (Just following CUU over the past 2-3 years alone probably turned enough of my hair grey)

However, the same reason why retail has not been jumping in on CUU is the same reason why CUU will continue to add value for a potential buyout; even if Teck walks. That reason is E.E. The retail do not want to be controlled by one single majority owner.

Following "WORST CASE" BFS that was released, the worst case scenario of Teck walking away would result in EE stepping in to Drill the necessary holes, release another RE with MAJOR improvements to the "waste rock" and possibly poke some holes in surrounding areas just to show off our potential district.

Therefore, worst case is CUU stumbles through 2013 and negotiates a buyout following another R.E. with somebody other than Teck.

How likely is it that Teck walks away from a Giant Copper project in their backyard for another major to step in 1 year later and be making money for a MIN 20-30 years?

6
Jan 07, 2013 07:10PM
4
Jan 07, 2013 07:35PM
10
Jan 07, 2013 07:37PM
5
Jan 07, 2013 07:52PM
9
Jan 07, 2013 08:07PM
30
Jan 07, 2013 08:19PM
9
Jan 07, 2013 08:26PM
9
Jan 07, 2013 08:28PM
7
Jan 07, 2013 08:33PM
3
Jan 08, 2013 12:39AM
11
Jan 08, 2013 01:59AM
23
Jan 08, 2013 02:39AM
9
Jan 08, 2013 08:49AM
18
Jan 08, 2013 09:12AM
15
Jan 08, 2013 09:26AM
7
Jan 08, 2013 09:32AM
4
Jan 08, 2013 09:34AM
8
Jan 08, 2013 09:40AM
1
Jan 08, 2013 09:54AM
2
Jan 08, 2013 09:59AM
3
Jan 08, 2013 10:04AM
3
Jan 08, 2013 10:08AM
21
Jan 08, 2013 11:34AM
1
Jan 08, 2013 11:46AM
5
Jan 08, 2013 11:49AM
1
Jan 08, 2013 12:03PM
1
Jan 08, 2013 12:12PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply