Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - Copper Fox Metals Inc. - Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

Copper fox metals

Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

9

Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM

9

Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM

Re: Not Good - Russ

18

Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM

Re: Not Good - Russ

3

Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM

Re: Not Good - Russ

10

Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM

22

Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM

Re: Not Good -- Russ Reid

5

Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM

4

Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM

Re: Not Good - Russ

4

Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM

32

Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish

4

Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish

Feb 07, 2013 11:33AM

6

Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM

8

Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM

3

Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM

Pat66

Rank: Treasurer [?]

Points: 2006 [?]

Votes: 91 Score: 2.2 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

in response to

Re: Not Good - Investorish

by

posted on Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM

Log in to use the IP Check tool ^[?]

The FS was always about SC only. The other 100 mineralised zones with the Mira and the 1-1 correlation was NEVER included, so I'm not sure why people expected an FS that would send us to the moon. We were promised a conservative FS. It's everything else that we have that will get us a decent buy-out.

13 Recommendations

Loading...

Loading...

17

Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

15

Feb 07, 2013 12:10PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

4

Feb 07, 2013 12:25PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

3

Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

8

Feb 07, 2013 12:43PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

7

Feb 07, 2013 02:50PM

Re: Not Good - cbew

10

Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM

Re: Not Good - cbew

16

Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM

Re: Not Good - well imo

1

Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM

Re: SP Premiums

2

Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM

Re: SP Premiums

7

Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM

Re: SP Premiums

14

Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM

Re: SP Premiums

12

Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM

Re: SP Premiums

12

Feb 07, 2013 04:26PM

Re: SP Premiums

9

calvin123456789

Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM

Re: SP Premiums

7

Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM

Re: SP Premiums

Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM

Re: SP Premiums

2

Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM

Re: SP Premiums

11

calvin123456789

Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

4

Feb 07, 2013 07:02PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

18

Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

31

Feb 07, 2013 08:06PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

26

Feb 07, 2013 08:10PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

3

Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

16

Feb 07, 2013 08:39PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

Feb 07, 2013 08:47PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

8

Feb 07, 2013 09:01PM

40

Feb 07, 2013 09:10PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

11

Feb 07, 2013 09:14PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

2

Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

2

Feb 07, 2013 09:22PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

5

Feb 07, 2013 10:32PM

Re: Not Good at First Glance - But Look at what is recommended!

7

Feb 07, 2013 11:49PM

20

Feb 07, 2013 11:50PM

Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

29

Feb 08, 2013 12:40AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

3

Feb 08, 2013 09:38AM

17

Feb 08, 2013 09:46AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

14

Feb 08, 2013 10:00AM

Re: Not Good - WG

Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al. Trebor

Feb 08, 2013 10:17AM

Re: Not Good-WG

Feb 08, 2013 10:45AM

Re: Not Good-WG

8

Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

7

Feb 08, 2013 09:45PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

5

Feb 08, 2013 09:49PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

14

Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

18

Feb 08, 2013 10:30PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

16

Feb 08, 2013 10:35PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

5

Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

8

Feb 08, 2013 11:14PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

17

Feb 08, 2013 11:36PM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

2

Feb 08, 2013 11:47PM

Right by the xxxxs

3

Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

12

Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM

Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

10

Feb 09, 2013 12:14PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

11

Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

5

calvin123456789

Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

12

Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

12

Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

10

Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

7

Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

6

Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

9

Feb 09, 2013 05:07PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

4

Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

5

Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

12

Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

1

Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM

Re: Right by the xxxxs

9

Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM

Re: Not Good-WG

1

Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM

Re: Not Good-WG

9

Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM

Re: Not Good-WG

2

Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM

Re: Not Good-WG

2

Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

Share

Share

Share

Please to post a reply