Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Not Good
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM
18
Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM
10
Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM
22
Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM
5
Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM
32
Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM
6
Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM
8
Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
13
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
17
Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM
10
Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM
16
Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM
1
Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM
14
Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:26PM
9
Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM

Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM
11
Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM
18
Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM
3
Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM
40
Feb 07, 2013 09:10PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM

I'll tell you guys the truth about the waste.

We knew it was there and not worth drilling. It's expected to be pay dirt but the high values will be sporadic. They will determine how to feed it by blasting/dozing and testing. A few holes will be drilled with a small bore just to do it quickly and cheaply. On a break even analysis the drilling we did was far more valuable. Who would do a resource on waste?? They expect it to be high enough grade to use in the feed. They know there are some very nice grades within it. You have to understand how a mill operates. Grade, hardness, grind size all play a role. They have to average the material through. Remember the geo teck holes? The high grades got everyone's attention. Also, we were just discovering this might be a hydro system which explained the sporatic high grades. That's why I call for about 30% to be good grade and a small portion to be very high grades. If you got the results uncapped you'd be bewildered as to why it was called waste. Remember the description of the overlain secondary mineralization. Back then we were discussing the transport method. Mark my words, it's not waste. But a huge drilling program would be a waste.


Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM
17
Feb 08, 2013 09:46AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:45AM
8
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
14
Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM
5
Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM
3
Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM
12
Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM
11
Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM
10
Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM
7
Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM
6
Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 05:07PM
4
Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM
1
Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM
1
Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM
9
Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply