Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: ''bankable''
2
Feb 14, 2013 01:24PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 01:28PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 01:38PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 01:40PM
7
Feb 14, 2013 01:44PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 01:44PM
8
Feb 14, 2013 01:45PM

Feb 14, 2013 01:51PM
12
Feb 14, 2013 01:52PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 01:57PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 02:03PM
12
Feb 14, 2013 02:07PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 02:08PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 02:10PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 02:14PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 02:19PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:21PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:22PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:32PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 02:37PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 02:38PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:41PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:43PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 02:48PM
43
Feb 14, 2013 03:10PM

Feb 14, 2013 03:10PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 03:13PM
13
Feb 14, 2013 03:24PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 03:34PM
8
Feb 14, 2013 03:36PM

Feb 14, 2013 03:38PM

Feb 14, 2013 03:40PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 03:41PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 03:43PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 03:45PM
19
Feb 14, 2013 03:46PM
5
Feb 14, 2013 03:54PM
9
Feb 14, 2013 03:54PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 04:05PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 04:11PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 04:32PM
14
Feb 14, 2013 04:41PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 04:52PM

"We have to conclude that the Liard shares will only be transferred if Teck "agrees" with the feasibility. The decision has not been made yet."

I think Teck is aware that in the event they want to reneg on the Bankability issue, that would force CUU to go to court

Teck had way too much particpation thruout the FS exercise, both with Tetra Tech and Merit to think they would prevail on those pretty much cut and dried numbers that were intentionally understated to preclude such an outcome

They may well decide that the economics are too skimpy and opt not to back in, although I would find that highy unlikely

But I don't think there is much on an option for them to not convey the Liard interests

...an interest that it would appear that they would not put much value in anyway, should they opt to not preoceed with Schaft


Feb 14, 2013 05:16PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 05:19PM
24
Feb 14, 2013 05:27PM
9
Feb 14, 2013 05:38PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 05:40PM
12
Feb 14, 2013 06:02PM
7
Feb 14, 2013 06:28PM
17
Feb 14, 2013 07:15PM
16
Feb 14, 2013 07:31PM
5
Feb 14, 2013 08:34PM
11
Feb 14, 2013 08:43PM
16
Feb 14, 2013 08:47PM
10
Feb 14, 2013 08:49PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 09:02PM
10
Feb 14, 2013 09:16PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 09:46PM
9
Feb 14, 2013 09:53PM
10
Feb 14, 2013 10:22PM
7
Feb 14, 2013 10:25PM
17
Feb 14, 2013 10:58PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 11:08PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 11:11PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 11:14PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 11:17PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 11:27PM
5
Feb 14, 2013 11:40PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 11:46PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 11:50PM
27
Feb 15, 2013 12:16AM
7
Feb 15, 2013 12:35AM
1
Feb 15, 2013 01:18AM
2
Feb 15, 2013 01:30AM
22
Feb 15, 2013 01:40AM
10
Feb 15, 2013 01:53AM
17
Feb 15, 2013 09:38AM
1
Feb 15, 2013 09:47AM
3
Feb 15, 2013 09:56AM
5
MES
Feb 15, 2013 10:06AM
4
Feb 15, 2013 10:10AM
2
Feb 15, 2013 10:15AM
7
Feb 15, 2013 10:16AM
5
MES
Feb 15, 2013 10:25AM
4
Feb 15, 2013 10:40AM
1
Feb 15, 2013 11:12AM

Feb 15, 2013 11:31AM
7
Feb 15, 2013 11:34AM
6
Feb 15, 2013 11:38AM
4
Feb 15, 2013 11:39AM
3
Feb 15, 2013 12:27PM
10
Feb 15, 2013 12:35PM
2
Feb 15, 2013 12:59PM
2
Feb 15, 2013 01:05PM
3
Feb 15, 2013 01:07PM
1
Feb 15, 2013 01:14PM

Feb 15, 2013 01:19PM
1
Feb 15, 2013 01:43PM
8
Feb 15, 2013 10:43PM
6
Feb 15, 2013 11:33PM
21
Feb 16, 2013 01:43AM
7
Feb 16, 2013 08:28AM
9
Feb 16, 2013 09:53AM
5
Feb 16, 2013 11:45AM
11
Feb 16, 2013 11:45AM
2
Feb 16, 2013 11:51AM
1
Feb 16, 2013 11:56AM
2
Feb 16, 2013 11:59AM
2
Feb 16, 2013 12:05PM

Feb 16, 2013 12:09PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 12:28PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 12:53PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 12:58PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 12:58PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 01:03PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 01:15PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 01:38PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 01:50PM
6
Feb 16, 2013 01:56PM

Feb 16, 2013 01:58PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 02:31PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 03:04PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 03:12PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 03:17PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 03:17PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 03:26PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 03:26PM
3
Feb 16, 2013 03:36PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 03:36PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 03:40PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 03:46PM
5
Feb 16, 2013 03:48PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 03:50PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 05:07PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 05:40PM

Feb 16, 2013 09:22PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 10:12PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 10:42PM
24
Feb 16, 2013 10:50PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 11:06PM
3
Feb 17, 2013 12:20AM
7
Feb 17, 2013 08:06AM
1
Feb 17, 2013 10:14AM

Feb 17, 2013 10:43AM
7
Feb 17, 2013 10:55AM
11
Feb 17, 2013 11:04AM
2
Feb 17, 2013 12:05PM
3
Feb 17, 2013 01:02PM

Feb 17, 2013 01:13PM
6
Feb 18, 2013 02:12PM
6
Feb 18, 2013 03:35PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply