Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: ''bankable''
2
Feb 14, 2013 01:24PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 01:28PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 01:38PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 01:40PM
7
Feb 14, 2013 01:44PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 01:44PM
8
Feb 14, 2013 01:45PM

Feb 14, 2013 01:51PM
12
Feb 14, 2013 01:52PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 01:57PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 02:03PM
12
Feb 14, 2013 02:07PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 02:08PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 02:10PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 02:14PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 02:19PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:21PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:22PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:32PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 02:37PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 02:38PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:41PM

Feb 14, 2013 02:43PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 02:48PM
43
Feb 14, 2013 03:10PM

Feb 14, 2013 03:10PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 03:13PM
13
Feb 14, 2013 03:24PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 03:34PM
8
Feb 14, 2013 03:36PM

Feb 14, 2013 03:38PM

Feb 14, 2013 03:40PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 03:41PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 03:43PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 03:45PM
19
Feb 14, 2013 03:46PM
5
Feb 14, 2013 03:54PM
9
Feb 14, 2013 03:54PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 04:05PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 04:11PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 04:32PM
14
Feb 14, 2013 04:41PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 04:52PM
8
Feb 14, 2013 04:59PM

Feb 14, 2013 05:16PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 05:19PM
24
Feb 14, 2013 05:27PM
9
Feb 14, 2013 05:38PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 05:40PM
12
Feb 14, 2013 06:02PM
7
Feb 14, 2013 06:28PM
17
Feb 14, 2013 07:15PM
16
Feb 14, 2013 07:31PM
5
Feb 14, 2013 08:34PM
11
Feb 14, 2013 08:43PM
16
Feb 14, 2013 08:47PM
10
Feb 14, 2013 08:49PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 09:02PM
10
Feb 14, 2013 09:16PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 09:46PM
9
Feb 14, 2013 09:53PM
10
Feb 14, 2013 10:22PM
7
Feb 14, 2013 10:25PM
17
Feb 14, 2013 10:58PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 11:08PM
4
Feb 14, 2013 11:11PM
2
Feb 14, 2013 11:14PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 11:17PM
6
Feb 14, 2013 11:27PM
5
Feb 14, 2013 11:40PM
1
Feb 14, 2013 11:46PM
3
Feb 14, 2013 11:50PM
27
Feb 15, 2013 12:16AM
7
Feb 15, 2013 12:35AM
1
Feb 15, 2013 01:18AM
2
Feb 15, 2013 01:30AM
22
Feb 15, 2013 01:40AM
10
Feb 15, 2013 01:53AM
17
Feb 15, 2013 09:38AM
1
Feb 15, 2013 09:47AM
3
Feb 15, 2013 09:56AM
5
MES
Feb 15, 2013 10:06AM
4
Feb 15, 2013 10:10AM
2
Feb 15, 2013 10:15AM
7
Feb 15, 2013 10:16AM
5
MES
Feb 15, 2013 10:25AM
4
Feb 15, 2013 10:40AM
1
Feb 15, 2013 11:12AM

Feb 15, 2013 11:31AM
7
Feb 15, 2013 11:34AM
6
Feb 15, 2013 11:38AM
4
Feb 15, 2013 11:39AM
3
Feb 15, 2013 12:27PM
10
Feb 15, 2013 12:35PM
2
Feb 15, 2013 12:59PM
2
Feb 15, 2013 01:05PM
3
Feb 15, 2013 01:07PM
1
Feb 15, 2013 01:14PM

Feb 15, 2013 01:19PM
1
Feb 15, 2013 01:43PM
8
Feb 15, 2013 10:43PM
6
Feb 15, 2013 11:33PM
21
Feb 16, 2013 01:43AM
7
Feb 16, 2013 08:28AM
9
Feb 16, 2013 09:53AM
5
Feb 16, 2013 11:45AM
11
Feb 16, 2013 11:45AM
2
Feb 16, 2013 11:51AM
1
Feb 16, 2013 11:56AM
2
Feb 16, 2013 11:59AM
2
Feb 16, 2013 12:05PM

Feb 16, 2013 12:09PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 12:28PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 12:53PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 12:58PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 12:58PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 01:03PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 01:15PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 01:38PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 01:50PM
6
Feb 16, 2013 01:56PM

Feb 16, 2013 01:58PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 02:31PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 03:04PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 03:12PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 03:17PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 03:17PM
1
Feb 16, 2013 03:26PM
2
Feb 16, 2013 03:26PM
3
Feb 16, 2013 03:36PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 03:36PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 03:40PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 03:46PM
5
Feb 16, 2013 03:48PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 03:50PM

"These rights were assigned to CUU. CUU can assign the rights as long as it holds 10% of the company. But, assigning the rights to someone else does not end the contract. We are specifically looking at ending the contract without completion and not a failure to perform because that is breach. If Salizar was still here he would have to hold an insider position and still would not be free of the contract."

I guess I am now gettng confused at what you are trying to get at. What do you mean "ending the contract without completion"? Didn't we already complete the project by delivering the Positive Feasibility Study? And, why would we want to end the contract? I thought the idea to invest in CUU is for the buy-in/buyout from Teck which, hopefully, we are just a few weeks away from that outcome.

In addiion, paragraph 12.1 below, does IMO, end the contract between CUU and Teck. If Teck does not elect a backin/backout by June 4, 2013 (end of 120 days), CUU can sell its 100% ownership of Schaft Creek to another major. New legal documents would then be drawn, releasing Teck and the Option Agreement from CUU, upon giving 1% of CUU shares or $1M cash to Teck, while transferring the Liard shares to CUU.

In the possible scenario of Teck backing in, and CUU not being interested in pursueing a JV with Teck, then Teck, IMO would draw up new legal documents between them and a new JV. Teck and their new JV will then draw up new Agreements with applicable, present day terms and conditions, releasing CUU of all liabilities, etc.

Sorry if I'm being deft here, WG. Please help me understand what I am missing. Thanks.

12.1 Except in accordance with this section and sunject to Teck Cominco committing the whole of the Property (or any portion thereof) on Salazar's behalf as security for required financing pursuant to Sect. 8.3(c), Salazar shall not transfer, convey, assign, mortage or grant an option in the Property or its rights under this Agreement. If Salazar wishes to sell its interest in the Property or to assign its rights under this Agreement, Teck Cominco shall have the right of first refusal, which shall expire if the Back-in Right expires without being exercised.

8
Feb 16, 2013 05:40PM

Feb 16, 2013 09:22PM
7
Feb 16, 2013 10:12PM
4
Feb 16, 2013 10:42PM
24
Feb 16, 2013 10:50PM
8
Feb 16, 2013 11:06PM
3
Feb 17, 2013 12:20AM
7
Feb 17, 2013 08:06AM
1
Feb 17, 2013 10:14AM

Feb 17, 2013 10:43AM
7
Feb 17, 2013 10:55AM
11
Feb 17, 2013 11:04AM
2
Feb 17, 2013 12:05PM
3
Feb 17, 2013 01:02PM

Feb 17, 2013 01:13PM
6
Feb 18, 2013 02:12PM
6
Feb 18, 2013 03:35PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply