Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: New buy out / back in pool
1
Mar 17, 2013 12:56PM
2
Mar 17, 2013 01:07PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 01:49PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 02:33PM
24
Mar 17, 2013 03:19PM
1
Mar 17, 2013 09:09PM
5
Mar 17, 2013 10:14PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 01:20AM

Mar 18, 2013 08:48AM
3
Mar 18, 2013 08:51AM
10
Mar 18, 2013 09:18AM
7
Mar 18, 2013 12:09PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 12:13PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 12:14PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 01:55PM
30
Mar 18, 2013 02:52PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 03:15PM
5
Mar 18, 2013 03:20PM
7
Mar 18, 2013 03:49PM
10
Mar 18, 2013 04:08PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 04:11PM
4
Mar 18, 2013 04:26PM

Just a reminder:

20% back-in = Teck must spend $85M

40% back-in = Teck must spend $256M

75% back-in = Teck must spend $341M

The 40% and 75% back-in amount can really only be achieved if a mine is built. That's a multibillion dollar commitment from Teck. (Remember, Teck only obtains the back in amount after the full spending is reached. If they back in for 75% and only spend $300M, then they will not have achieved any back-in interest yet. Correct?)

The 20% back-in allows Teck to optimize the project and obtain an interest without committing huge amounts of money ($85M). There is a risk that the remaining 80% is sold to someone else, but Teck has the advantage of having inside information on things like the environmental assessment, drilling results, feasibility updates, etc. If they like what they see, they can use their inside knowledge to buy out the rest of the project. If they don't like what they see, they can spend their $85M and will at least have obtained an interest in the project that they can sell to someone else down the road. Seems pretty logical to me.

10
Mar 18, 2013 09:57PM
16
Mar 19, 2013 12:45AM
6
T2T
Mar 19, 2013 02:04AM
10
Mar 19, 2013 05:33AM
16
Mar 19, 2013 06:49AM
16
Mar 19, 2013 09:29AM
6
Mar 19, 2013 09:36AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:43AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 09:47AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:59AM
13
Mar 19, 2013 10:08AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 10:11AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:16AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 10:21AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:31AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:40AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:43AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:50AM
14
Mar 19, 2013 10:52AM
7
Mar 19, 2013 10:55AM

Mar 19, 2013 11:02AM
6
Mar 19, 2013 11:43AM
5
Mar 19, 2013 11:45AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 11:53AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 11:55AM
11
Mar 19, 2013 12:11PM
1
Mar 19, 2013 12:13PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:17PM
5
Mar 19, 2013 12:19PM
4
Mar 19, 2013 12:22PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:47PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply