Junkers87

I don't think Turr and I are disagreeing. I'm not suggesting for one minute that we aren't entitled to this information. My point is that some of the information that was disclosed in that video and vis a vis to the CIC members has not been disclosed by way of PR. I'm saying that it either should have been disclosed as part of a PR to the public domain or not disclosed at all.

Obviously, my preference is that if PC is going to make a statement that we're filing for Nasdaq in June with a partner then it should be made public by way of PR. And, by the way, whether you like it or not, we retail shareholders are in the public domain from a public company perspective.