...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Sincerely,

George et al

Message: Re: Statistical Significance
4
Apr 13, 2019 07:50AM
3
Apr 13, 2019 10:21AM
3
Apr 13, 2019 10:51AM
7
Apr 13, 2019 10:56AM

10BagR - Great explanation!

I reread Tundup's repost from last year by Cabel and he had said the following;

"Should be able to give top line results even if don’t reach 250 events (but will continue with trial until do reach 250 events). (Not sure I fully understood how you can give top line results before reaching the target number of events….)."

They are saying that they could have ended trial and given top line results at some point in time like year-end even without reaching 250 MACE but that they wouldn't. They would continue to 250 regardless of the time it takes to achieve that which as they have said will strengthen the trial. 

3
Apr 13, 2019 02:36PM
3
Apr 16, 2019 10:40PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply