TYHEE GOLD CORP

(PRESS PROFILE TAB FOR FACT SHEET & UPDATES)

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

Dear Agoracom Family,

I want to thank all of you for your patience with us over the past 48 hours and apologize for what was admittedly a botched launch of our new site.

As you can see, we have reverted back to the previous version of the site while we address multiple forum functionality flaws that inexplicably made their way into the launch.

To this end:

1.We have identified 8 fundamental but easily fixable flaws that will be corrected in the coming week, so that you can continue to use the forums exactly as you've been accustomed to.

2.Additionally we will also be implementing a couple of design improvements to "tighten up" the look and feel of the forums.

Sincerely,

George et al

Message: NEWS !!!!! Thank you RON4U

Here is the very prompt, very encouraging and paraphrased reply from Dave Webb. I had asked him about the grab samples on Clan Lake. Please refer to my previous message for the exact question.

Dave says he is pleased with the Pond Zone numbers (reported today).

He reports that Tyhee has taken close to one hundred grab samples of the Cranberry, Morel, Iceberg, and Cub Zones to the northeast of the Main Zone. The values of the zones tend to range between 1 and 10 gpt with some higher. The highest values came from 2 or 3 samples from the Cub Zone at the extreme NE end of our defined gold trend. These are the most unusual samples but they occur within rocks that fall within that 1 to 10 gpt range. Overall there appears to be limited continuity with the extremely high-grade samples, but a pattern exists with these samples that requires further work to define. So his short answer is there are assays greater than 100 gpt (2 or 3 samples), and the extremely high-grade values come from isolated domains that are not continuous, but there appears to be a number of them. Lots more work is required.

Dave intends to follow-up on these samples.

He says that increasing the resource at Clan Lake could require a quick resource revision, which would likely take only a few hours and would cost less than $5,000. He believes this is a very useful thing to do. On the other hand, preparing an NI 43-101 report on this revision would take several days and cost more money. Whether the NI 43-101 is a good idea or not depends on what the results of the more informal resource revision are.

Thanks Dave!

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply