Free
Message: Re: Handal (back up counsel) for IPR- Google v. EDIG
2
Nov 22, 2015 07:16PM
3
Nov 22, 2015 09:27PM
2
Nov 22, 2015 10:15PM
6
Nov 23, 2015 09:46AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 10:35AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 10:43AM

Nov 23, 2015 10:53AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 10:56AM
6
Nov 23, 2015 11:04AM
3
Nov 23, 2015 11:09AM
8
Nov 23, 2015 11:18AM
2
vic
Nov 23, 2015 11:29AM
2
Nov 23, 2015 11:40AM
12
Nov 23, 2015 11:44AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 11:53AM
13
Nov 23, 2015 12:04PM
4
Nov 23, 2015 12:58PM
2
Nov 23, 2015 01:25PM
4
Nov 23, 2015 01:51PM
9
Nov 23, 2015 02:28PM

Nov 23, 2015 03:07PM
3
Nov 24, 2015 08:39AM
4
Nov 24, 2015 09:08AM
1
Nov 24, 2015 09:20AM
14
vic
Nov 24, 2015 10:10AM
2
Nov 24, 2015 10:35AM
6
Nov 24, 2015 10:36AM
7
Nov 24, 2015 11:03AM
4
vic
Nov 24, 2015 11:19AM
11
Nov 24, 2015 11:24AM
4
Nov 24, 2015 11:40AM
10
Nov 24, 2015 12:47PM
9
Nov 24, 2015 02:21PM
8
Nov 27, 2015 09:21AM
4
Nov 27, 2015 09:55AM
5
vic
Nov 27, 2015 11:20AM

I believe In regard to Handal acceptance by PTAB/IPR for backup counsel , lack of denial so far by the board is in favor of his credential and acceptance of his petition.

"only a single lead counsel and single back-up counsel is allowed in any Inter Partes Review proceeding."

In regard to timig of response for accepting IPR review ,we may hear

by Dec or Mid January re this decision. JMO

“The preliminary proceeding begins upon filing of the petition. Three months thereafter the Patent Owner has the opportunity to file a preliminary response. Once this response is entered, the USPTO has three months, by statute, to Order trial. As can be appreciated this "front end" or preliminary proceeding can span a maximumn of 6 months. Of the 34 trials Orders issued to date, the average time is hovering right around the 5 month mark.”

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply