"You fill me with curiosity what New Probe might be wanting to drill right away, and also whether will be independent or tethered to Gold Corp.? It also makes me wonder even more about this sale to Gold Corp. if Dave finds something right away, then it would make me suspect that this was more of a giveaway, especially if tethered to GC." Riskit

According to the proposed TO, G will have <10% (9.9%?) of the New PRB, hence by definition G is not an insider, hence the New PRB would be independent of G under the eyes of the regulators, unless G has representation in the new PRB BoD. However, this is on paper.

They may have other unwritten agreement, which we are not aware of, to have the New PRB tethered to G. Come to think about it, if G has almost 10% of the New PRB (to be below the regulatory radar) it would not be a surprise to see its influence (tethered?) on the New PRB. At least, a call from G CEO would be picked up, or returned ASAP, by CEO Dave who would "consult" on a regular basis with big brother G.

With respect to the new name for the New PRB (as Probe Minerals? as indicated by CapT) and the listing on the TSX Venture Exchange, I have not been able to have a confirmation. Can someone (CapT?) provide a link to the source, preferably from Probe itself.

Are they in an NR, or the Information Circular (which page of this thick doc)? Would appreciate the reference, since I could have missed them completely. Just wanted to get these facts straight.

goldhunter