The CEO of a company is normally the positive, public face of the company, but in this case, clearly, the CEO has done more damage to the company by her behaviour to the shareholders, and to the public's impression of SLI . Something else that really provokes my curiosity, why on earth has no one had any communication whatsoever with Murray Braucht about all this? Yes, we've been told that dealings between he and the company involve all things legal, but does that mean his freedom of speech to shareholders has somehow also been taken away? Is there no one on management who can cut through all the BS and give a clear picture of what's really going on ? If there is, that person would most DEFINITELY get my vote to replace the current ceo !!!!!!!! Anyone who knows such a person, sing out.