Hi Aim, I am sorry if I was unclear in my presentation, and will try to more clearly convey in this post.

What I was getting at, I believe it is of little use to only keep focusing on sending letters to the same couple compliance officers, because of non action. I believe we need to expand the focus to encompass as many more contacts in hopes that other agencies may step in here and help with establishing the obligatory accountability toward shareholders, upon the regulators. I agree that we keep sending letters to the narrow focus of compliance in conjunction with newer efforts once again, and yes, document every little thing.

It is totally ridiculous how long the list of seemingly violations of policies has grown, from perhaps one page a couple years ago, to several pages now, with apparently no reprimands or protection of our investment evident. At this point, to write a complaint, we had to become investigators ourselves, and it is taking considerable time to outline and elaborate on the lengthy list. It is total incompetency from regulators, when investors have to fully explain to professional regulators how and why policies have been broken, and it is further incompetency and negligence, when there is no enforcement. In the confines of logical thought, how is this possible for the escapade of negligence to go on and on, with no action taken by regulators? It may be very clear to most by now, that the word "theory' may be able to be dropped from the term "conspiracy theory", to help explain what is actually going on with our circumstance. What else can logically explain non action from high and mighty regulators?

Here is a list of some places to send letters, I suggest to broaden this list through ones own creativity to perhaps a 100 or more. A broader perspective sometimes is more effective and efficient than a narrow focused one, which can be easily controlled and/or suppressed.