Free
Message: Re: PACER digEcor - Rulings on Partial Summary Judgments

Yet another ruling in favor of EDIG.

Accordingly, e.Digital is entitled to a declaration that e.Digital did not breach the October 22 Agreement’s “Functional Specifications” clause. Conversely, digEcor’s motion for a finding of breach is denied.

-------

A ruling for digEcor.

B. Duty to Negotiate Revenue Sharing Agreement in Good Faith
e.Digital maintains that digEcor was bound by the October 22 Agreement to negotiate a revenue sharing deal in good faith. There is no indication from the record that any such negotiations took place, so if such a duty existed, a ruling that digEcor breached would be warranted. digEcor responds that the October 22 Agreement’s promise to negotiate is unenforceable under New York law. As discussed below, digEcor is correct on this point. Accordingly, the October 22 Agreement’s good faith negotiation clause is unenforceable under New York law. Summary judgment in favor of digEcor and against e.Digital on this issue is therefore appropriate.




13
Mar 13, 2009 09:20PM
1
dlj
Mar 14, 2009 05:44AM

Mar 14, 2009 10:42AM

Mar 14, 2009 02:30PM

Mar 14, 2009 02:32PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:54PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:56PM
12
Mar 14, 2009 04:34PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:48PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:52PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 05:38PM

Mar 14, 2009 06:39PM
10
Mar 15, 2009 07:23AM
3
Mar 15, 2009 07:39AM
2
Mar 15, 2009 07:59AM
5
May 26, 2009 01:30PM
3
May 26, 2009 02:33PM
3
May 26, 2009 05:53PM
6
May 26, 2009 06:15PM
4
May 27, 2009 06:28AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply