Free
Message: Re: PACER digEcor - Rulings on Partial Summary Judgments

EDIG owes digEcor a refund on the 1250 batteries purchase price but the delayed delivery of the digEplayer 5500's is a wash.



digEcor insists that it should be awarded a judgment that e.Digital breached the PO
because e.Digital did not deliver the digEplayer 5500s until many months after called for by the PO. e.Digital contends that it is excused for any late delivery by Maycom’s failure. Put simply, neither party is entitled to its requested judgment. Because there was no established time window for delivery, and because the facts surrounding the delay are in dispute, digEcor is not entitled to a ruling that e.Digital breached as a matter of law.

In sum, digEcor is granted a judgment that e.Digital breached a contract to provide 1250 Li-on batteries and that it is entitled to a refund of the batteries’ purchase price. Consequential damages as a result of this breach are a factual question. In contrast, disputed questions of fact mean that both parties are denied judgment on their claims regarding the breach of the PO for e.Digital’s delayed delivery of the digEplayer 5500s.

13
Mar 13, 2009 09:20PM
1
dlj
Mar 14, 2009 05:44AM

Mar 14, 2009 10:42AM

Mar 14, 2009 02:30PM

Mar 14, 2009 02:32PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:54PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:56PM
12
Mar 14, 2009 04:34PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:48PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:52PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 05:38PM

Mar 14, 2009 06:39PM
10
Mar 15, 2009 07:23AM
3
Mar 15, 2009 07:39AM
2
Mar 15, 2009 07:59AM
5
May 26, 2009 01:30PM
3
May 26, 2009 02:33PM
3
May 26, 2009 05:53PM
6
May 26, 2009 06:15PM
4
May 27, 2009 06:28AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply