Free
Message: Re: PACER digEcor - Rulings on Partial Summary Judgments

An expected ruling in favor of digEcor. EDIG did not deny the claim.


A. Li-on Batteries
digEcor argues that e.Digital has breached the PO by not delivering any of the 1250 Li-on batteries that digEcor paid for. e.Digital does not deny that it failed to provide batteries to digEcor, nor does e.Digital deny that digEcor has paid for them. Accordingly, a summary judgment in favor of digEcor on its claim that e.Digital is in breach of the PO by not providing batteries is warranted. A judgment that digEcor is entitled to the purchase price of the batteries is also appropriate. To the extent that digEcor also seeks consequential damages on for failure to deliver the batteries, that claim presents a factual issue that, on this record, cannot be decided on summary judgment.

13
Mar 13, 2009 09:20PM
1
dlj
Mar 14, 2009 05:44AM

Mar 14, 2009 10:42AM

Mar 14, 2009 02:30PM

Mar 14, 2009 02:32PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:54PM

Mar 14, 2009 03:56PM
12
Mar 14, 2009 04:34PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:48PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 04:52PM
2
Mar 14, 2009 05:38PM

Mar 14, 2009 06:39PM
10
Mar 15, 2009 07:23AM
3
Mar 15, 2009 07:39AM
2
Mar 15, 2009 07:59AM
5
May 26, 2009 01:30PM
3
May 26, 2009 02:33PM
3
May 26, 2009 05:53PM
6
May 26, 2009 06:15PM
4
May 27, 2009 06:28AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply