"Regarding the shareholders’ committee, I do not think that the CCAA Court and/or KRY can legally recognize and assign any rights to the nine shareholders that compose it and ignore the rest of us. This is either a win-win or a lose-lose situation for the shareholders as a group. However, the size and commonality of a "class" is hugely important when pleading before a court. So, the more petioners before the court, the more relevant the "class" is. That was the objective of the opt-in representation by Gowling."

So we were just traction for the bus and nothing more. The 9% was a farce dreamed up by who?