HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Email I'd like to share-F_Sudbury-Rose...
50
Sep 04, 2008 12:27PM
2
Sep 04, 2008 12:42PM

Thank you. However, if you send a sample to an assay lab and ask for analysis of say Ni or Cu, I don't remember being asked what the expected value was when I submitted samples for analysis. High Cr, however, involves special analytical techniques. Ni and Cu are routine analyses. It was up to the lab to ensure that a proper range of standards was used for analysis. Hence, I don't buy into NOT's response re "overlimit" for Ni and Cu. Analysis of core from AT12 for Ni and Cu should be routine. Cr assays are irrelevant for AT12 as the visuals said semi-massive sulphides.

Using the "assay values" as an excuse, is in my opinion, "smoke and mirrors".

geoprof

6
Sep 04, 2008 04:35PM
5
Sep 04, 2008 05:08PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply