"We have put up money to help the company develop these properties but we are the last to profit."

Actually this is an interesting point. In fact, only those who have participated in a PP or an IPO have put up the money to support the company and the company has long since had that money. All of the rest of the "investors" simply bought those shares for the going rate from the original owner who then tried to make money from those that came after. And those that came after are simply buying those shares in speculation of making more money, though their money never reaches the company, as they believe that the company sp will go higher. So those that complain about being investors in the company, having put their money out there for the company should really consider what it is that they have done for the company.... that they should receive what they think is owing to them.

"I understand the strategy to "stay under the radar" and make it to mine development, I believe ultimately that is the way to much more profit in the long run but if it involves holding material information that sould be released it is wrong."

"If it involves" is the most important part of this paragraph...."IF", aside from the fact that that you support flying under the radar. How does one fly under the radar if they are spilling everything they have to the media....which is how shareholders find out what is going on? So which point do you actually support?