...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
Message: Re: ACC 2019 Abstracts
4
Nov 27, 2018 12:02PM
2
Nov 28, 2018 08:40AM
2
Dec 05, 2018 09:34PM
3
Dec 05, 2018 11:22PM
1
Dec 17, 2018 12:23PM
2
Dec 17, 2018 12:32PM
3
Jan 02, 2019 11:23AM
2
Jan 16, 2019 10:44AM
4
Jan 24, 2019 10:05AM
2
Feb 05, 2019 01:29PM
4
Feb 05, 2019 04:54PM
5
Mar 04, 2019 11:58AM
3
Mar 04, 2019 12:06PM
3
Mar 04, 2019 03:40PM
3
Mar 04, 2019 04:56PM
3
Mar 04, 2019 11:04PM
2
Mar 04, 2019 11:30PM
3
Mar 16, 2019 08:06PM
3
Mar 18, 2019 02:48PM

Mar 18, 2019 02:54PM
2
Mar 18, 2019 04:05PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 12:10PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 12:18PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 01:21PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 01:25PM

Topcoin and Bear,

I think the true sample size for the cognition experiment is the 467 patients who completed the initital MoCa test (and who comprise 19% of the total BoM patient population - those who are over 70, although at least one 69-yr-old appears to have been included).  Of these, 53% (n=246) showed impaired cognition at the beginning of the study (average MoCa=22, range from 7 to 25).  The remaining 221 (47%) patients are those who did not show impairment at the beginning of the trial but are still part of the cognition experiment (all of these had MoCa scores of 26 or greater by definition, and, if you do the arithmentic, you can calculate that their median was about 28).

You can see from the initial data that the range in MoCa was great (from 7-30).  People with mild cognitive impairment have values around 22, those with AD have values of around 16 (or worse, presumably).  The change in MoCa score will be evaluated in all patients in the experiment, regardless if they showed impairment at the beginning or not.  Hopefully, about half each of the 'impaired' and 'normal' older patients were allocated to each of the placebo and apabetalone arms.  It would be great if the apabetalone treatment actually improved the MoCa score in impaired individuals, but a more realistic hope would be that the patients on apabetalone showed a smaller decrease in MoCa over time.

2
Mar 19, 2019 02:45PM
4
Mar 19, 2019 03:24PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 04:09PM
3
Mar 19, 2019 05:39PM
4
Mar 19, 2019 07:31PM
3
Mar 20, 2019 11:48AM
2
Mar 20, 2019 12:10PM
1
Mar 21, 2019 11:59AM
6
Mar 21, 2019 03:10PM
3
Mar 21, 2019 05:54PM
2
Mar 22, 2019 06:52PM
2
Mar 23, 2019 08:14AM
2
Mar 26, 2019 10:44AM
2
Mar 26, 2019 02:00PM
3
Mar 26, 2019 03:23PM
4
Mar 26, 2019 04:12PM
1
Mar 26, 2019 04:17PM
3
Mar 26, 2019 06:37PM
4
Mar 26, 2019 07:55PM
2
Mar 26, 2019 10:36PM
3
Apr 02, 2019 01:50PM
6
Apr 18, 2019 11:39AM
5
May 10, 2019 04:43PM
3
May 13, 2019 03:40PM
5
May 20, 2019 12:18PM
4
May 22, 2019 06:33PM
1
May 22, 2019 08:33PM

May 22, 2019 09:05PM
1
May 22, 2019 09:21PM
5
May 22, 2019 10:40PM
2
May 23, 2019 10:05AM
7
May 29, 2019 02:47PM
6
May 30, 2019 05:02AM
2
May 30, 2019 02:34PM
2
Jun 04, 2019 10:12PM
3
Jun 10, 2019 04:59PM
4
Jun 10, 2019 08:27PM
1
Jun 10, 2019 10:18PM
2
Jun 24, 2019 02:15PM
1
Jun 24, 2019 03:03PM
1
Jun 24, 2019 05:28PM
7
Jun 26, 2019 09:25AM
4
Jun 26, 2019 10:00AM
3
Jun 26, 2019 10:34AM
7
Jun 26, 2019 11:00AM
2
Jun 26, 2019 05:18PM
5
Jul 01, 2019 08:38PM
1
Jul 01, 2019 09:37PM
2
Jul 02, 2019 01:00AM
1
Jul 02, 2019 08:33AM
2
Jul 02, 2019 08:43AM
4
Jul 02, 2019 09:42AM
1
Jul 02, 2019 10:26AM
1
Jul 02, 2019 10:32AM
6
Jul 02, 2019 10:44AM
4
Jul 02, 2019 12:13PM
3
Jul 02, 2019 12:27PM
4
Jul 02, 2019 01:03PM
5
Jul 02, 2019 02:28PM
3
Jul 02, 2019 02:34PM
2
Jul 02, 2019 03:23PM
4
Jul 18, 2019 04:12PM
6
Sep 16, 2019 03:11PM
1
Sep 16, 2019 03:46PM
2
Sep 16, 2019 04:04PM
2
Sep 16, 2019 04:11PM
3
Sep 17, 2019 06:13AM
3
Sep 17, 2019 10:04AM
4
Sep 17, 2019 10:34AM
7
Sep 17, 2019 10:55AM
5
Sep 17, 2019 11:04AM
1
Sep 17, 2019 11:34AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply